This indirect mapping will result in loss of FP precision because 0.5 will be added to near-zero values of upcoming fragment’s depth, which will vanish the trick. But without ARB_clip_control the mapping of z to depth values converts range to range, so depth will range from 0.5 to 1.0 in our case. As the result, all clipped z values lay in range - those fragments behind the projection plane are all culled. Using glClipControl(GL_LOWER_LEFT,GL_ZERO_TO_ONE) we set the clipping volume to be:Ġ=zNear).Most values of the depth will be concentrated in near-zero region, that is why we need the help of exponential part of FP to prevent the loss of precision for near-zero values. Therefore, the depth value (assuming default direct mapping of depth values) is calculated as follows:Īs a result, all pixels behind the clipping plane have their depth values laying outside region, so those are culled for the fragments sitting on the clipping plane the depth is 1.0, for all further fragments the depth approaches positive zero.Īs depth is reversed (the further the fragment the smaller the depth) we must set glDepthFunc(GL_GREATER) to make the depth test working properly.Īnd the final part, which brings sense to all that: we must use the floating-point z-buffer.
ZNear: distance to the near clipping plane (tiny constant, like 0.0000.1).
I am confused… Somewhy I was sure it is, but now… Hm… Maybe I just confused myself…Ĭonfigure the projection matrix like this: It is important that the range is not -Wc<=Zc<=Wc for the approach described below. Using glClipControl(GL_LOWER_LEFT,GL_ZERO_TO_ONE) we set the clipping volume to be: Here is my plan that involves this extension: May I ask why you are so excited with ARB_clip_control? This extension could slightly improve precision, but I can still live quite good without it.I see this extension as part of the solution of the depth-fighting problem. If you write application for wider audience, well … many years could pass until many of them could try your application. If it runs on other people computers and you can control how they manage drivers, have NV cards, presumably post-Fermi, etc., you should wait at least a year to have a proper functioning. If it runs on your computer it is just fine. At least on your own computer.īut don’t force others to use them, since they can be unstable or miss some functionality.Īlso, it is not useless to write an application based on new features. For other vendors the time could pass until the support is brought to users. But usually it requires some time for thorough testing and implementation polishing, inducing certain latency for the inclusion in the release version of the drivers. It is really great for enthusiasts wanting to try new features.
Opengl 4.4 drivers drivers#
NVIDIA releases beta drivers with the latest OpenGL at the same time a new specification is announced. If you have no idea what Linux is i would recommend you to stay away from that, Linux is not just an Operating System, it's something more complicated than that, and if you don't want to learn new ways of doing what you normally do on Windows, moving to Linux is not the right move.No, it is not a WinXP specific problem. Linux and other operating systems I did not use
Opengl 4.4 drivers update#
I need advice, I don't know where to ask so I'll write this topic, I want to buy a new laptop and I've already found one that I like, but the problem is that the operating system has Linux, I've never used an operating system other than Windows, is the difference between Windows and Linux? Will ATS and ETS2 work on Linux? (and other games) How will it be from updates and DLC, will I get an open beta version of the update on the day of release or is it just for Windows owners? Will I be able to buy DLC even if I use Linux? If anyone could answer my questions, I would be very grateful to them, I remind you once again I have been a long-time user of Windows.
0 kommentar(er)
